A new way to build AI agents
Not answer questions.
Not follow instructions.
Think with you.
Prompt engineering → context engineering →
rhythm engineering.
The Problem
AI is powerful. It knows more than you. It's faster than you.
Yet it doesn't think like you.
It doesn't see problems the way you've learned to see them. It doesn't move through complexity the way years of practice taught you.
It doesn't have your methodology.
"I need a pilot program for a B-212 helicopter."
Remember Trinity in The Matrix? She needs to fly a helicopter. She's never flown one.
In seconds, the knowledge uploads — and she doesn't just know the controls, she knows how to fly.
Not step-by-step instructions. Not a manual. Something deeper.
The Helix Pattern works the same way. We don't give AI instructions to follow.
We encode how you think — your lenses, your methodology, your way of moving through problems — and AI reasons through it alongside you.
The result isn't automation. It's augmentation.
Prompt and context engineering got us far. But they're still about what you give AI.
Rhythm engineering is about how you think together.
Rhythm engineering switches cognitive modes — the same company, same context, same model — but tuned to a different frequency of intelligence. The result isn't better output. It's a different kind of thinking.
In Practice
Unilever. 10-year vision. Prompt engineering vs Rhythm engineering.
The world is building task agents — agents that execute, follow workflows, automate.
Useful. But limited when expert judgment matters.
We're building something different.
Who This Is For
Anyone can look things up. Anyone can generate text.
You have something different. A way of working.
A methodology developed over years. Ways of seeing that others miss. A progression through complexity that gets results.
What We Build Together
We work with select practitioners to encode their methodology into a co-intelligent partner.
From the Founder
I built this because I needed it.
As a strategy consultant, I had frameworks — ways of seeing, progressions through complexity — that I couldn't just "prompt" into AI.
So I encoded them differently. Not as instructions. As scaffolding.
What emerged surprised me. AI wasn't following my methodology. It was reasoning through it.
Applying it to new problems. Thinking with me. Reaching insights neither of us would reach alone.
I called the implementation Helix Engine. The underlying pattern — The Helix Pattern — is how anyone can do this.
Your expertise. Your methodology. Your thinking agent.
Early Access
If you have methodology worth encoding — expertise that shapes how you work, not just what you know — we want to hear from you.
We'll be in touch if there's a fit.